- #Retroshare feed reader code#
- #Retroshare feed reader password#
- #Retroshare feed reader professional#
Subscribing to my personal timeline(s) with my favorite RSS reader would bring everything together, especially if I had a reader that listed items chronologically independent of source. Twitter was on the right track before revenue growth got in the way.
#Retroshare feed reader password#
Reading various streams in an aggregator would be most easily accomplished if various decentralized platforms would support stream output as password protected RSS. There are actually three problems to solve, reading, which is relatively easy, posting, which is harder, and social graph management, which is quite complex Since decent platforms don’t have a revenue model to protect, why can’t they be more aggregation friendly? Mike Caulfield suggested that smartphone OS’s were functioning as aggregators via notifications. There have been some attempts at this (seesmic/tweetdeck/etc.) aimed at the major commercial social networks, but, since feeding into an aggregator undermines the revenue model of the social network (remember how Twitter used to support RSS?) they were either acquired or left to wither. Wouldn’t it be nice to aggregate this content so you could follow everything from one app. That’s quite a few apps to open regularly. Note that those indicated in italics are more web replacement than social network platform. In the last few months, I’ve experimented with :
#Retroshare feed reader code#
The latter has moved more quickly than the former, since it’s arguably easier to write code than to lay fiber optic cable.
#Retroshare feed reader professional#
This is helped by the ability to adjust audio quality anywhere between an Opus compressed low (16Kbps) bitrate to a fully uncompressed 32-bit PCM, perfectly acceptable for professional audio production.In the wake of recent FCC plans to repeal net neutrality regulations, people are starting to talk about decentralization, both of infrastructure and of the platforms we use to communicate on the Internet. Even across hundreds of miles, latency was typically less than 50ms, and often lower, making not just conversation more natural but also opening up the very real possibility of musical collaboration or direct podcast recording. The results can be staggering and far better than other chat or audio streaming solutions we've used. Latency will depend on hardware and network conditions, and each row includes specific details on the upstream and downstream latency, bitrate per channel, and the size of the jitter buffer that is used to iron out variations. Each row includes controls to adjust volume and left/right pan, as well as an input meter and the ability to add compression, and a noise gate effect to help with legibility and remove background noise. With this done, a new row will start to appear in the UI for each machine connected to the session, and everyone can speak or listen at the same time. You can even run your own connection server to get the best of both worlds. Both these actions can be accomplished through either a public or private group created on a server, which defaults to, or via a direct connection to the ports and IP addresses of the machines you wish to connect to. The first thing you need to do is either connect to another user or share your own session. After launching the application, the first thing you notice is that the UI is simple, well designed, and easy to use. It's an open source peer-to-peer audio streaming solution that promises both high quality and low-latency audio across a LAN or the Internet. Mumble perhaps gets closest with relatively low latency and uncompressed multitrack audio options. Over the years, there have been many attempts to solve this problem, such as the closed source TeamSpeak and the open source Mumble. A significant delay makes any kind of musical collaboration impossible, and that means that while the modern Internet can easily accommodate Zoom calls with two dozen people, it's more difficult to satisfactorily connect even a couple of musicians together, despite the lesser requirement in bandwidth. But there's a threshold where it quickly becomes impossible to tie the spoken words to the people who spoke them, and the same thing happens in a video chat and with musicians, where distance can have an effect on latency and performance. If you've ever watched a film with the audio out of sync, you'll know that a certain amount of delay is imperceptible. What it can't do, at least not comfortably, is predict and iron out timing issues. In conversation, it can almost completely filter out background noise, accommodate strong accents, and error correct sentences better than 200 percent checksum redundancy.
When it comes to communication, it's amazing how adaptable the human brain can be.
0 kommentar(er)
